Polish Supplementary School Council of America Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 136213581
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Dix Hills, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5162797609
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,985,260
- Expenses
- $2,873,178
- Assets
- $324,390
- Liabilities
- $35,424
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOROTA ANDRAKA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ANETA MATYSZCZYK (SPOKESPERSON): $5,794 total reported compensation
- RENATA JUJKA (VICE PRESIDE): $4,665 total reported compensation
- DOROTA ANDRAKA (PRESIDENT): $4,510 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster polish culture and teach polish language.
What it reported doing in 2024
Polish language and culture school. Language courses for kids and teens promotion of culture, history, convening workshops and conventions, awarding scholarships, facilitating origin trips and research, advancing pedagogical techniques, cultural awareness and appreciation fostering partnerships with cultural organizations. Writing and developing educational content by teachers, publishing a high- quality magazine, distributing the magazine to educators, organizing collaborative workshops for content creation, providing professional development resources, fostering a community of practice among teachers, promoting innovative teaching strategies.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 73% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 95
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.2%; rating input score 93
- Program expense ratio: 96.9%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $1,187.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Pass
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.5%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.8%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 50.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 50% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 35% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.2% of revenue deployed · 96.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $6K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and related organizations
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 64 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 54 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.