Polish Heritage Festival Inc C/o James P Jozwiak
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201595996
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Springville, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7169982501
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Cultural, Ethnic Awareness
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,683
- Expenses
- $13,256
- Assets
- $34,920
- Liabilities
- $49,030
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES P JOZWIAK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAMES P JOZWIAK (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES D JOZWIAK (VICE-PRESIDE)
- CHRISTINE JOZWIAK (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To promote, preserve and foster a better understanding of polish culture by means of festivals, dances, musicals and other community activities.
What it reported doing in 2016
Promotion of polish culture and heritage through an annual polish heritage festival which increases public awareness of current and historical polish culture and heritage, while promoting a better understanding of polish-american contributions to american society.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, and 33% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.1%; rating input score 64
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.9%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.63; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.4; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -22.7% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -20.8% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 21 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2009 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.