Police Officers Alliance of Minnesota

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260020607
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Minneapolis, MN, USA
Phone
6127881676
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Law Enforcement

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,983
Expenses
$24,241
Assets
$32,182
Liabilities
$2,601

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LYALL DELANEY (PRESIDENT)
  • MATTHEW HAGEN (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LYALL DELANEY (PRESIDENT)
  • MATTHEW HAGEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • WALLY KRUEGER (SECRETARY/TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose and mission of the police officers alliance of Minnesota is to:-promote safety for the citizens of the state of Minnesota and the law enforcement officers that serve them.-maintain the highest levels of professionalism for Minnesota's peace officers.-work to improve the compensation, benefits and working conditions for peace officers in the state of Minnesota.-educate the public and political leaders regarding issues affecting public safety and other matters important to peace officers.-advance the public's image of and support for Minnesota's peace officers.-maintain a state-wide organization for peace officers that is unaffiliated with any specific labor union and that operates under sound financial principles.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -247.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.33; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -52.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2010 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.