Police Athletic League Inc of Trenton

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
216001661
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Trenton, NJ, USA
Phone
6093960325
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Centers, Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,773
Expenses
$5,984
Assets
$39,857
Liabilities
$6,996

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Daniel J Howell (President)
  • Daniel S Howell (Executive Director /CFO)

People named in this filing

  • Gail E Faille (Secretary)
  • Richard Czyz (Board Member)
  • Chris Kmiec (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Youth services activities - Sports and social programs. Programs for the Trenton, NJ area youth consisting of social and recreational activities, after school activities, tutoring and mentoring, baseball, soccr and college tuition assistance

What it reported doing in 2024

Regular programs were severely limited due to the post COVID 19 pandemic. Limited outdoor activities were limited to baseball and soccer activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.8%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 38.4%; rating input score 38

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -115.8%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.66; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.8% of revenue deployed · 38.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 15/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.