Poj Koob Yawm Ntxwv
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 800270311
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Fresno, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5597907739
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $24,518
- Expenses
- $24,025
- Assets
- $10,616
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Stacey Vue (President)
- Xoua Yang (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Stacey Vue (President)
- Xoua Yang (Vice President)
- Ying Xiong (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Practice and teaching of the traditional principles and beliefs of the Poj Koob Yawm Ntxwv religious and preserve Hmong Culture.
What it reported doing in 2013
We will come together to celebrate Hmong holidays and observe various ceremonies. Celebrations preserve Hmong ethnic traditions and culture, and may also serve to educate those who have interest in Hmong tradition. The traditional religion binds the community together as members share in religious responsibilities, partake in family rituals, and help one another in the practical tasks related to ritual performances. Ancestral worship keeps the Hmong family strong and family relations harmonious. By helping people remember their ancestors and their roots, it also serves to strengthen Hmong identity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 11.9%; rating input score 12
- Program expense ratio: 12.2%; rating input score 12
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 11.9% of revenue deployed · 12.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.