Point One Vision

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
834143972
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Rating
95
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$109,349
Expenses
$112,701
Assets
$11,105
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Michael Mayo (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Sarah Aiko Mayo (Director and Board Preside)
  • Jadihel Rodriguez (Board Treasurer)
  • Courtney McCormick (Board Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Point One Vision strives to empower individuals through experience and education, embracing the motto "strong to serve." This faith-based organization is dedicated to fostering health, healing, and fitness within the community, promoting a purpose-driven life focused on benefiting others based on the model life of Jesus Christ.

What it reported doing in 2024

SERVE Missions & Support Teams: The SERVE acronym stands for selflessness, empathy, revelation, value, and embody. These programs encompass partnerships with like-minded organizations, both domestically and internationally. Initiatives include providing fitness leadership for youth with limb loss, supporting suicide and addiction prevention through group fitness, and offering health education in the Middle East. Additionally, Point One Vision contributes to the development of a community center in rural Eastern Uganda, integrating fitness, education, and medical support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.1%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.6%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 96% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 35.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -26.2% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $117K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.