Point Break Water Polo Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 990844747
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6263724486
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $29,325
- Expenses
- $28,101
- Assets
- $4,831
- Liabilities
- $168
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRANDON HUFF (President & CEO)
- ANDREW WRIGHT (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- BRANDON HUFF (President & CEO)
- JILLIAN BUSHMAN (Secretary)
- GREGORY WRIGHT (CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empowering communities through water polo, point break water polo club is a youth sports program committed to fostering athleticism, leadership, and camaraderie. Strive to provide accessible opportunities for individuals of all ages and backgrounds to engage in the sport, promoting physical well-being, metal resilience, and teamwork. Through education, outreach, and inclusive programming, we aim to instill valies of sportsmanship, discipline, and respect for water safety.by creating a supportive environment that encourages growth and excellence, we seek to inspire passion for water polo and cultivate a lasting impact on individual and our communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Develop the sport of water polo
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 34
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33.5%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: 34.9%; rating input score 35
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.2%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -136.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -81.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 31.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33.5% of revenue deployed · 34.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 35/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.