Pneuma - Winds of Hope Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
113462236
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Bay St Louis, MS, USA
Phone
2283635286
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$238,882
Expenses
$349,005
Assets
$377,386
Liabilities
$430,024

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ZACHARY FILLHART (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ZACHARY FILLHART (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $66,881 total reported compensation
  • DIANA FILLHART (PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR): $6,492 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To share the love of jesus christ throughout the world through the avenues of prayer, proclamation and provision. To make a difference 1 by 1 in the lives of those recovering from the hardships of life, through providing experiential education in life and restaurant skills, preparing them for a successful and fulfilling life.

What it reported doing in 2022

Ray of hope- a community outreach program to provide supportive resiliency measures for individuals as referred to for the challenges of cancer, effects of disasters, life altering illness, and accidents. Supportive measures include providing personal assistance for needs, meal preparation, peer listening and providing affected persons a place to talk about their experiences. Limited financial assistance for people experiencing financial hardship related to illness or disease. Assistance in paperwork and resource referral for financial resources. We provided meals for those with life altering illness and cancer.during covid-19 we continued to provide over meals to the elderly and those with health conditions such as diabetes, high blood pressure, cancer and did personal home visits. We also provided food for the kings kitchen and customers donated over $2000.00 toward food expenses. The focus for 20212included trying to rebound the starfish caf training center and support for the local community. We successfully achieved our goals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 65
  • Sustainability: 18
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 72.6%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -46.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.14; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 72.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $253K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $67K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2016 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.