Plymouth County's Outreach Hope Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460970650
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Conway, SC, USA
- Phone
- 5082615488
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Prevention Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,043
- Expenses
- $53,832
- Assets
- $27,893
- Liabilities
- $1,092
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNE MARIE WINCHESTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SUSAN SILVA (PRESIDENT)
- SARAH ANN CLOUD (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ANNE MARIE WINCHESTER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- SUSAN SILVA (PRESIDENT)
- SARAH ANN CLOUD (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To proactively provide a safe gateway to substance use information, resources, support and hope for individuals and their loved ones, as well as promoting awareness and education in partnership with the community-at-large.
What it reported doing in 2024
Paving the path: pco hope's paving the path initiative focuses on providing financial resources that enable individuals the opportunity to seek treatment and maintain long-term sobriety. Paving the path initiatives include treatment scholarships and transitional benefits.drop-in centers: judgement-free help, information and resources. Drop-in centers take place weekly across two locations in plymouth county.outreach: annually, pco hope sponsors, co-sponsors, and participates in various outreach programs designed to educate and raise awareness in communities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 90% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 62% for direct work, and 38% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 84.5%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -155.8%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.52; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 84.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $46K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.