Plumbing-heating-cooling Contractors Association of North Texas
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721523910
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Bedford, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8175542314
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $112,639
- Expenses
- $77,466
- Assets
- $240,827
- Liabilities
- $3,275
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALICIA BARON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MIKE TREVINO JR ((IMMEDIATE) PAST PRESIDENT)
- TODD KIRKHAM (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOSH KING (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ALICIA BARON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MIKE TREVINO JR ((IMMEDIATE) PAST PRESIDENT)
- TODD KIRKHAM (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide information to members and the public for the advancement of the plumbing-heating-cooling industry and to provide education and promote safety issues for members
What it reported doing in 2024
Luncheon meetings - in 2024, the association held 5 luncheon meetings & training classes. A total of approximately 78 members and associates attended the meetings to keep abreast of industry trends, safety & industry information and to network.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 61% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 1
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 1.2%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 1.2%; rating input score 1
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.2%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.11; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 66.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 1.2% of revenue deployed · 1.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $946 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.