Pleasant Valley Trap Team

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990688030
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bettendorf, IA, USA
Phone
5634492070
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fishing, Hunting

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,223
Expenses
$88,768
Assets
$68,950

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HENRY C OLSEN (President)

People named in this filing

  • CHARLES MITCHELL (Director)
  • MARK DIETSCHE (Director)
  • HENRY C OLSEN (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Pleasant Valley Trap Team provides an educational and competitive youth shooting sports program through adult coaches and volunteers who instruct and supervise athletes in the safe use of firearms while participating in the disciplines of the clay target shooting sports. The Pleasant Valley Trap Team develops successful youth shooting athletes while modeling positive behaviors to reinforce the character values of sportsmanship, teamwork, self-discipline, and repsonsibility.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our main program service accomplishments through our fundraising is to promote sportsmanship, teamwork, self discipline and responsibility by paying the entrance fees to competitive competitive events during the season, buying team apparel for each athlete and providing ammunition for all the practice and state championship events during the season. We try to mitigate the family's expenses because we know it is an expensive sport and we want ALL the athletes to participate and compete as much as as they desire.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 14%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 48.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.