Pleasant Grove Athletic Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752428174
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Texarkana, TX, USA
Phone
9037480482
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$103,240
Expenses
$122,346
Assets
$48,419

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHLEY GIBBS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LINDA D GREEN (TREASURER)
  • ASHLEY GIBBS (PRESIDENT)
  • MANDI ELROD (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the organization shall be to work with and through the athletic director, school administration and duly elected school board members of the pleasant grove independent school district for the betterment of all school athletic programs.

What it reported doing in 2025

All athletic programs at pleasant grove schools receive benefits from our program. Sponsored team events to promote school spirit. Funds are raised by concession sales at athletic functions, sale of ads in football programs, sale of hawk gear, membership drives and other fund raising events. We purchase equipment, supplies, meals and travel for the pleasant grove isd athletic department. Services and requests we were able to grant this year include but are not limited to: hudl video software renewal, megaphones, treatment table, drones, meals and snacks for players and coaches, bonuses for coaches and retreat for seniors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 97% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 16
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -18.5%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.1% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.