Plastics Pipe Institute Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522165679
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Irving, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4694991044
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,583,132
- Expenses
- $5,341,095
- Assets
- $4,302,604
- Liabilities
- $368,814
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID FINK (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID FINK (PRESIDENT): $407,094 total reported compensation
- CAMILLE GEORGE RUBEIZ (SENIOR DIVISION ENGINEER): $313,508 total reported compensation
- SARAH PATTERSON (HSB DIRECTOR): $283,294 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Plastics pipe institute, inc.'s (ppi) mission is to make plastics the material of choice for all piping applications. Ppi is accomplished through contributing to the development of standards; educating designers, installers, users, and government officials; publishing up-to-date technical and general reports; collecting and publishing industry statistics; establishing forums for problem solving and new idea generation; maintaining liaisons with industry, educational, and government groups; providing technical focus for the industry; and supplying the associated web sites with up-to-date information.
What it reported doing in 2024
The ppi annual meeting was held in may and the ppi semi-annual meeting was held in october, where staff members participated in industry conferences concerning pipe, construction, engineering, and infrastructure economics. Ppi membership grew slightly compared with the prior year, with approximately 190 members. Ppi continues to conduct research into various aspects of plastic pipe and use that information to improve and promote its long term economic and environmental benefits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 92% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.6%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.5% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $407K · 21 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $590K reported
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.