Plant City Champions for Youth Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934725128
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Plant City, FL, USA
Phone
8137634238
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$169,966
Expenses
$140,791
Assets
$101,693

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JACK HOLLAND (DIRECTOR)
  • DAVID KINGHORN (DIRECTOR)
  • ROBERT OLSZEWSKI (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization will promote activities and opportunities that help plant city, Florida area young people build strong character and realize their full potential as responsible citizens and leaders through service, personal development, and recreational opportunities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Plant city champions for youth inc. Donates to various organizations to help support the plant city area youth, such as but not limited to: athletics (sports leagues, competitions, scholarships), academics (high school graduate scholarships), student development (speech contest, law appreciation program, youth recognition program), and youth-oriented community service programs (citywide easter egg hunt, police department "kid care packs", food bank programs, ymca youth programs).

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 81% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 20
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.5%; rating input score 19
  • Program expense ratio: 22%; rating input score 22

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.2%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.72; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 181.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 77.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 18.5% of revenue deployed · 22% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $31K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 19/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.