Plano Wildcat Quarterback Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752424405
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Plano, TX, USA
Phone
2143264084
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$77,659
Expenses
$88,851
Assets
$11,035

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Erica Pitts (President)

People named in this filing

  • Erica Pitts (President)
  • Lindi Buscetta (Secretary/Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The plano quarterback club provides support to the plano independent school district (pisd) for the maintenance of the locker room, weight room facilities, and equipment for the high school football rogram. This is administered to assist the pisd maintain a competitive football program. Of course, this provides students with the valuable experiences ofteam sports and plano wildcat quarterback club inc 75-2424405

What it reported doing in 2025

The club helps maintain the locker-room by paying for repairs on existing equipment, which benefits approximately 280 players and their 25 coaches who use this workout room. Additionally, the club pays for the maintenance and upkeep of a golf cart that is used by the coaching staff to transport equipment to the playing field and back again to the storage unit. The club pays for professional filming and video production of practice sessions and of games played in order to improve the performance and safety of players and to assist the coaches with game strategies. The pisd does not have this expense in their budget for football, so the club pays this expense. The benefit of this service promotes faster learning, player safety, and a more competitive team.program service accomplishments: the club provides small stipend scholarships to graduating seniors who are going to continue in collegiate football program in colleges and universities. This is a small part of the club's mission, but helps get recognition of the pisd football program, and its coaches when one of ours becomes famous. This also promotes goodwill for pisd alumni. The organization was able to show appreciation to the coaches and staff by providing meals, assist with travel expenses and providing general hospitality the organization did not, during the year, receive any funds, directly, or indirectly, to pay premiums on a personal benefit contract. The organization, did not, during the year, pay any premiums, directly, or indirectly, on a personal benefit contract.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 22
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -14.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $140K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.