Planned Parenthood of the Rochester/syracuse Region Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
160743085
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Rochester, NY, USA
Phone
5855462771
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Planning Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,990,328
Expenses
$12,373,864
Assets
$9,980,493
Liabilities
$2,305,291

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

20 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ARTHUR GLASER CPA (VICE PRESIDENT & CFO)
  • JAMES STEWART (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • RACHAEL PHELPS MD (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $210,839 total reported compensation
  • JAMES STEWART (PRESIDENT & CEO): $183,991 total reported compensation
  • ARTHUR GLASER CPA (VICE PRESIDENT & CFO): $112,737 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Planned parenthood of the rochester/syracuse region empowers individuals to take responsibility for their sexual and reproductive health by providing health care, support for survivors of sexual assault, education, and advocacy. Our vision is a supportive community where individuals are guaranteed access to sexual and reproductive health care, and trusted to make responsible decisions free of coercion and fear.

What it reported doing in 2013

Other programs operated by pprsr include: rape crisis service (rcs) provided 1,400 survivors of sexual assault and their significant others counseling and support in monroe, genesee, livingston, orleans and Wyoming counties, engaged over 8,000 people through community education programs and professional trainings, collaborated with the suny geneseo help establish sexual assault counseling and support services to students, collaborated with ibero american action league to help service young latina girls who have been affected by sexual assault. In control, a teen pregnancy prevention program in rochester, empowered over 1,000 inner city teens through educational, vocational and recreational projects teens participated in two college tours (in rochester and Washington, dc). Other activities for youth included photography, dance, color guard, drum core, music and theater development and community service projects.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 76
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 83.9%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.22 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.1%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 83.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $10.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $211K · 20 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $772K reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.