Planned Parenthood of Hawaii

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
996012377
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
2063287731
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Planning Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$141,666
Expenses
$252,524
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Christine Charbonneau (President/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Christine Charbonneau (President/CEO): $366,404 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To be the leader in reproductive health services, education and advocacy for the people of Hawaii.

What it reported doing in 2015

Clinical services program operated three health centers in Hawaii - located in Honolulu (Oahu), Kahului (Maui), Kailua-Kona (Big Island of Hawaii), (Kailua-Kona was closed by the end of the fiscal year). PPHI served more than 6,072 individual patients annually and provided more than 10,610 clinical visits. Board-certified physicians and advance practice nurse practitioners provided reproductive health care for males and females, including pelvic examinations, pap smears, screening and treatment for abnormal cervical cells, clinical breast exams, HPV vaccinations, pregnancy tests, birth control services and supplies, emergency contraception, screening and treatment for sexually-transmitted infections, abortion services and health education. A large percentage of patients were young women and teens seeking confidential, affordable reproductive health care and family planning services. The organization accepts most health insurances and offers family planning services on a sliding fee scale based on patient family income educational services program. The education and training department provides education and training that allows individuals to make informed sexual health decisions. In FY2015, PPHI educators presented 986 separate educational sessions, conducted 13 workshops and trainings, and made 24,586 direct contacts reaching more than 8,121 individual youth and adults including but not limited to students, parents, teachers, youth-serving professionals and others. Sessions were presented at 57 public and private schools, colleges and universities on Oahu, Maui, Lanai, Kauai and Hawaii Islands. PPHI staff worked with 32 different community-based and faith-based agencies statewide. In addition to education and training sessions, PPHI staff conducted 31 outreach activities including participating in community health fairs, events and media outreach. The PPHI education team is also contracted on both of the Office of Adolescent Health contracts in the state of Hawaii. In collaboration with Hawaii Youth Services Network Tier 1 Award, staff facilitate and provide training and technical assistance on evidence based programs statewide. In collaboration with University of Hawaii's Centers on Disability Services Tier 2 Award, PPHI staff collaborated to develop a culturally responsive teen pregnancy and HIV/STI prevention curriculum called "Pono Choices", created intensive in-person and e-learning trainings for teachers and provide fidelity monitoring and technical assistance to teachers that implement the curriculum statewide.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 6
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 96%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -78.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -67% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $242K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $366K · 22 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2009 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.