Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando

Legal name: Planned Parenthood of Greater Orlando Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
593092996
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2015
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2015
Location
Orlando, FL, USA
Phone
4072461788
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Planning Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,276,021
Expenses
$2,504,157
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JENNA TOSH (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JENNA TOSH (PRESIDENT/CEO): $14,357 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization provides quality and affordable family planning and health care services throughout the central Florida area.

What it reported doing in 2015

Planned parenthood of greater orlando, inc. Has served the central Florida community for over 20 years. We have a four county service area - orange, seminole, osceola and brevard. Last year, with our three health centers in orlando and kissimmee, we saw 15,808 patient visits of both men and women. Our services provide accessible, convenient, and affordable care to cour community. We provide a wide range of reproductive healthcare services including a multitude of contraceptive methods, vasectomies, pregnancy testing, options counseling, pap tests, breast exams, diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections, and pregnancy terminations.continued on schedule o.during the year, approximately 60,000 calls were received for assistance with various patient related services. Both health centers migrated into electronic medical records early 2013 and continue to work towards improvements to the client centered delivery of services. As a non-pharmacy dispensing site, planned parenthood of greater orlando, inc. Will be focusing on a point of sale system for pharmacy billing and has actively been contracting with pharmacy benefits management administrators of prescription drug programs.planned parenthood of greater orlando, inc. Is in the process of raising funds to expand much-needed services; like breast and cervical cancer screenings, sexuallly transmitted infection testing and family planning; to medically under-served osceola county. As of 12/31/14, the organization had raised over $1 million toward opening a full-service health and education center in kissimmee.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 95.4%; rating input score 95
  • Program expense ratio: 86.7%; rating input score 87
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.58 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -10%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0.6%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -19.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 95.4% of revenue deployed · 86.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $14K · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2011 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.