Planned Parenthood of Central and Western New York, Inc.

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
160746860
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Washington, DC, US
Phone
1-800-230-PLAN
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Planning Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$31,469,261
Expenses
$30,398,880
Assets
$29,269,925
Liabilities
$11,599,984

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHELLE CASEY (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHELLE CASEY (CEO): $434,590 total reported compensation
  • COLT WASSERMAN (CMO): $298,845 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTIAN OLECK (CFO): $253,760 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide, promote, and protect access to sexual and reproductive health care and education for all people.

What it reported doing in 2025

Education and outreach provides educational programming on sexual and reproductive health across our region. In 2025, we served 231 organizations in 91 zip codes. Overall, education and outreach provided education programs and outreach to 90,227 children, teens and adults, including through our 4 youth programs the connection, teen reality theatre, in control, and peer health advocates. The connection is a youth program in the city of niagara falls that provides free programs, including health education, evidence-based programs, homework assistance, job application assistance, gardening, sports, healthy cooking and healthy snacks to priority underserved youth over more than 200 days. Teen reality theatre is our youth program in the city of buffalo where participants write, create and perform skits and plays about adolescence, healthy relationships, and reproductive health for their peers and families. Participants are also peer health educators. Our in control youth program in the city of rochester empowered teens through educational, vocational and recreational projects. Other activities for youth included photography, music, podcasting, sewing/fashion, film and theater development and community service projects. Some participants become paid youth peer health educators. Peer health advocates in the city of syracuse provides youth peer education for priority youth. Peer health advocates also help with the diaper bank, providing free diapers and supplies to patients and gain paid work experience.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.5%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 77.9%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.4%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.4; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 75.5% of revenue deployed · 77.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $23.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $435K · 22 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
  • Consistency: 30 of 31 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.