Planned Parenthood Association of the Mercer Area Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 210723248
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015
- Location
- Morristown, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 9735399580
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Planning Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $608,139
- Expenses
- $1,088,290
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- D D'ARCANGELO (PRESIDENT/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- D D'ARCANGELO (PRESIDENT/CEO): $87,832 total reported compensation
- E DUMONT (VP OF FINANCE): $32,422 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Planned parenthood association of the mercer area, inc. (planned parenthood) is a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey. Planned parenthood believes in the fundamental right of each individual to manage his or her own sexuality and fertility, regardless of income, marital status, sexual orientation, age, race or national origin. We further believe that such responsible management will contribute to an enhancement of the quality of life, strong family relationships & community stability. Planned parenthood has been providing reproductive health care services to the women, men & teens of mercer county for more than eighty years. We provide the full range of reproductive health care services at our three health centers (trenton, hamilton, & at the college of New Jersey). Our services include life-saving cancer screenings, birth control, prevention & treatment of stds, breast health services, abortion services, pap tests, & sexual health education.
What it reported doing in 2015
Patient services encompasses the provision of patient healthcare information, options counseling and reproductive healthcare services to patients including gynecological care and contraception. Approximately 13,000 patient visits are provided each year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 83
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 4
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 78.1%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.39 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -79%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 11%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -53.5% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -17.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 78.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $850K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $88K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.