Planned Parenthood Advocates of the Mid-south
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262621341
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2009, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Memphis, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9017251717
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $23,167
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ASHLEY COFFIELD (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- ASHLEY COFFIELD (PRESIDENT): $129,527 total reported compensation
- JO KENDRICK (DIR OF FIN.): $101,455 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Protecting reproductive rights and women's health through education, advocacy and grassroots organizing.
What it reported doing in 2015
Advocating public policy that sustains reproductive freedom and health care and that positively affects the health of women, men and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 1
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -189.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 18 of 18 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.