Plainview Baseball Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 112586157
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Plainview, NY, USA
- Phone
- 5167542140
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $207,814
- Expenses
- $207,139
- Assets
- $199,087
- Liabilities
- $13,886
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IAN BOGATY (President)
- JOHN FARRELL (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- LAUREN ARGENTINA (Director)
- STEVE RIEGLER (VP Softball)
- IAN BOGATY (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To teach baseball, softball and good sportsmanship to the children of our community.
What it reported doing in 2018
Teach baseball, softball and good sportmanship to the children of our community. To provide an opportunity to receive scholarships and awards for their achievements in the sport.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 78% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 64.8%; rating input score 65
- Program expense ratio: 65%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.3%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 64.8% of revenue deployed · 65% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $135K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 23 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.