Place 4 Grace
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814361748
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Mount Vernon, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7408472232
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Family Services for Adolescent Parents
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $163,969
- Expenses
- $215,255
- Assets
- $304,587
- Liabilities
- $236,781
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Kandee Popham (Executive Director)
- Tammy Jones (President)
People named in this filing
- Kandee Popham (Executive Director)
- Tammy Jones (President)
- Twila Rogers (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To educate and minister christ's love and grace to unwed pregnat ladies and their children, in a safe, stable, home environment and eliminate generational cycles of unwed pregnancy, poverty, abuse, and addiction.
What it reported doing in 2025
To operate safe house for unwed pregnant ladies escaping abuse, addiction, etc
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 59.4%; rating input score 59
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -31.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.42; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.78; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78% of revenue deployed · 59.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $128K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.