Pjs from Grandma Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262827320
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Wadsworth, OH, USA
Phone
3308078187
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$460
Expenses
$52,067
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JUDITH D MIFSUD (PRESIDENT)
  • SHELLY A M KOHRS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH MIFSUD (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JUDITH D MIFSUD (PRESIDENT)
  • SHELLY A M KOHRS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH MIFSUD (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide pajamas to needy children

What it reported doing in 2023

In 2023, pj's from grandma, inc. Distributed 940 pairs of pajamas to various government and not for profit agencies for distribution to needy children. Since inception in 2008, we have donated over 15,000 pairs of pajamas with a value of over $170,000. The value of pajamas donated in 2023 was $12,389. Pj's from grandma, inc. Made cash donations totaling $3,000 each to twelve government and not-for-profit agencies in december 2023 to continue their programs post liquidation of pj's from grandma, inc.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -11,218.9%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -22.4% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.2% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.