Pittsburgh's Ohio Valley General
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251792662
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- Mckees Rocks, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4127776237
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $259,863
- Expenses
- $308,149
- Assets
- $4,031,025
- Liabilities
- $404,799
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pittsburgh's Ohio valley general hospital foundation provides support for Ohio valley general hospital, a non-profit hospital dedicated to providing high quality personalized healthcare, which includes offering programs and services to improve the quality of life within our community.
What it reported doing in 2011
The hospital foundation raises and provides funds to benefit and support the hospital's activities. The benefits include providing financial assistance with facility expansion and equipment acquisition. The foundation helps to support the hospitals services, programs, development, and community education and outreach. The hospital provides inpatient, outpatient and 24-hour emergency care services to area residents without regard for ability to pay, and we continue to offer free, subsidized or below-cost services within our community. The hospital also provides a complimentary shuttle service for those patients needing rides to and from the hospital.the hospital's centers of emphasis include wound care, pulmonary health, pain treatment, cataract & eye surgery and sleep evaluation. In addition, the hospital's "business-fit" program provides occupational healthcare services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 88
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.08; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 80.6%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 27.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $210K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $555K · 8 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.