Pittburg Fifty-Plus Club Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942410900
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Pittsburg, CA, USA
Phone
9252375555
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$111,783
Expenses
$50,666
Assets
$152,605
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LINDA CARRANZA (PRESIDENT)
  • SONJA SHEPHARD (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LINDA CARRANZA (PRESIDENT)
  • SONJA SHEPHARD (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JANET F BRAZIL (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve quality of life during the retirement years by addressing the unique challenges of the aging population in Pittsburg, CA, by providing services that build positive social interactions, mental health wellness & physical endurance.

What it reported doing in 2025

Activities/Events: Provide environment to encourage friendships among seniors with similar interests, helping them to navigate life transitions associated with aging (e.g., retirement, loss of significant others, relocation, decline in health): Bocce (50 occur/yr x 10 participants); Bowling League (23x32); Book Club (12x10); Digital Literacy Class (50x8); Dinner Dances (3x50); Friendship Breakfast (12x15); Hula Class (50x32); Kayaking (12x10); Line Dancing Class (11x30); Live Theater (4x20); Luncheons (3x30); Meetings (12x25); Movies (12x25); Paint Nite (3x30); Tai Chi Chih Class In-Person (50x15); TCC Class Online (156x6). Success measure #participants/#registeredx100%. We have over 90% success rate.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 56
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 81
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 43.1%; rating input score 43
  • Program expense ratio: 96.2%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.7%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.01; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -43.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 43.1% of revenue deployed · 96.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $96K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 43/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.