Pirate Youth Sports

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471058724
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Englewood, CO, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Sports Associations &Training Facilities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$168,014
Expenses
$197,401
Assets
$198,964

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Adam Deveroux (President)
  • Cherie Lueben (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Adam Deveroux (President)
  • Cherie Lueben (Vice President)
  • Cristian Claveria (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create an experience where every athlete: • Has fun at practice • Feels like an important part of the team regardless of performance • Learns 'life lessons' that have value beyond the playing field • Is coached using the principles of the Positive Coaching Alliance • Learns the skills, tactics and strategies of the game and improves as a player • Is exposed to, participates in and volunteers for community events Has an opportunity to participate in spite of economic means

What it reported doing in 2024

League fees allows for Pirate Youth Sports teams to compete against other teams from different leagues in the Denver metro area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.5%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.01; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.5% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.