Pioneer City County Museum
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751378561
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Sweetwater, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3252358547
- Rating
- 97
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Museum, Museum Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,997
- Expenses
- $78,141
- Assets
- $56,792
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JACQUE MCCOY (President)
- BILLY JOE JAY (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JACQUE MCCOY (President)
- NEMESIS ARMSTEAD (Director)
- BILLY JOE JAY (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We beleive that small museums in rurual locations can serve and improve our communities by offering rich, interactive, and immersive cultural and educational experiences.
What it reported doing in 2023
To preserve the heritage of nolan county and the city of sweetwater, and to share our history and culture with the local and global public. We strive to accomplish these goals through a comprehensive program of educational opportunities, exhibits, collections, and special events that nurture and broad inquisitive thought
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.73; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $78K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.