Pinnacle Health Home Care & Hospice
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232024121
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2011
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- Harrisburg, PA, USA
- Phone
- 7172318245
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,131,974
- Expenses
- $8,099,459
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Pinnacle health home care was dedicated to providing high quality holistic home care services to homebound individuals of all ages with intermittent skilled needs. Pinnacle health hospice was dedicated to providing comprehensive, individualized, quality care to terminally ill adults, children, and their families regardless of personal or financial circumstances.
What it reported doing in 2011
Pinnacle health hospice ("hospice") was a medicare certified, jcaho accredited and state licensed hospice program for terminally ill adults, children and their families. Care/support, with focus on both physical and emotional needs, was provided by an interdisciplinary team of professional health care providers. Hospice ceased operations on january 9, 2012. Hospice provided over 16,400 care days between july 1, 2011 and january 9, 2012 to approximately 340 patients. Hospice also offered a series of specialized, free of charge, bereavement programs for adults, children, and teens to the community at large, including support groups, educational workshops, and bereavement camps for area children and teens (camp dragonfly and camp draco). No one was ever denied hospice services because of their inability to pay, with fundraising dollars and donations offsetting the cost of providing care/services not reimbursed by insurance and bereavement support. Hospice had volunteers that provided unique skills, in-kind and various donated services. During the year volunteers provided 3,500 donated hours valued at approximately $60,000.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 42
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -32.1%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -38.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -74% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $6.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $783K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2009 to 2011
- Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.