Pinnacle Family Health Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721136639
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- West Monroe, LA, USA
- Phone
- 3183251092
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- AIDS
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $16,022,334
- Expenses
- $15,728,677
- Assets
- $7,359,135
- Liabilities
- $3,060,752
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARK WINDHAM (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- KEVIN MARCANTEL (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARK WINDHAM (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $359,876 total reported compensation
- NANCY HEAD (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $221,724 total reported compensation
- DAVID CULP (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $211,352 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of pinnacle family health is that we strive to provide affirming and inclusive care that is affordable and comprehensive for children and adults in northeast Louisiana.
What it reported doing in 2025
Ryan white part b HIV care grant program: there are two parts to this program - supportive services and housing opportunities for persons with AIDS. The purpose of the supportive services program is to develop or enhance access to a comprehensive continuum of high-quality HIV care and treatment for low-income people living with HIV, with the goals of reducing HIV incidence, increasing access to care and optimizing health outcomes, and reducing HIV-related health disparities.the purpose of the housing opportunities program is to provide housing opportunities for low-income persons living with HIV in order to prevent homelessness.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.9%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 91.6%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.47; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 20.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.9% of revenue deployed · 91.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $14.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $360K · 18 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.