Pink-4-Ever Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
262994557
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Indianapolis, IN, USA
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Cancer

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$482,697
Expenses
$331,410
Assets
$299,917
Liabilities
$31,000

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • NADIA MILLER (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTA WILSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • LISA HAYES (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • NADIA MILLER (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRISTA WILSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • COLLEEN MPOFU (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Remove barriers to breast health services and promoting quality, timely, affordable, and culturally sensitive care, leading to better breast cancer outcomes for Black women

What it reported doing in 2024

Awareness & Education - Our largest initiatives in this area are the Breast Health Summit (BHS) and Survivorship is A Lifestyle (SIL). Both offer education workshops, activities, and connections to resources for breast cancer survivors, health providers, caregivers, and more. The Summit is an integral part of our continuous efforts to engage community stakeholders to work collaboratively to improve access to timely and more effective breast cancer screenings, tests and treatments, especially for Black women, who disproportionately suffer poor breast cancer outsomes. SIL is a new initiative, with currently 205 enrolled, provides opportunities to enhance overall health, reduce breast cancer risk, and lower the chances of recurrance. Our The current and long term objectives are the same. Overall, our programs serve 827 individuals and includes 44 self-care and education workshops, 75 fitness classes, and 13 social connection events.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 49.7%; rating input score 50
  • Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $55.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31.3%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.9; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 47% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 62.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 75.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 49.7% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $240K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 26/100.