Pineville Community Hospital Assoc Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
610541901
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990 2014
Location
Pineville, KY, USA
Phone
6063373051
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,931,494
Expenses
$28,280,911
Assets
$11,002,405
Liabilities
$7,121,851

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

18 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • J MILTON BROOKS (CEO/DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • J MILTON BROOKS (CEO/DIRECTOR): $434,669 total reported compensation
  • WILLIAM GAUNT (DOCTOR): $253,526 total reported compensation
  • UYI-OGHOSA IDEMUDIA (DOCTOR): $220,505 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide, within our means, quality health care to the people of southeast Kentucky. Values: the staff of pineville community hospital is guided by the following values: a. Respect - we will recognize the worth, dignity, quality and importance of each other, the people we serve and the institution.b. Quality - continuous improvements in all aspects of healthcare provided is an attitude which must be our number one priority.c. Team work - each of us is an important part of the team; by working together, our goals can be achieved.d. Cost effectiveness - an important dimension of quality is the cost effectiveness of the service we offer; each of the team members is committed to the wise use of the resources available.vision: pineville community hospital will be providing top quality acute, outpatient, long term care (snf) and home health care while maintaining financial stability.

What it reported doing in 2014

Acute care services; the hospital is located in rural southeast Kentucky which is in the heart of the appalachian poverty belt. The hospital is an approved disproportionate share hospital (dsh) that provides each year more care than is required to qualify for the maximum dsh levels. The hospital also serves a high percentage of medicare and medicaid patients. The hospital is licensed for 120 acute beds and provided 7,632 days of care to the tri-county region of southeast ky during the year. 5,075 days of care were provided to medicare patients (66%) and 1,645 days were to medicaid patients (22%). The hospital provided 458 days of charity care during the year ended june 30, 2015. The hospital also had 440 bad debt days during the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 13
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 99.1%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 80.1%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.65; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 99.1% of revenue deployed · 80.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $22.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $435K · 18 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.