Pines Athletic Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 933479500
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Longview, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9032952763
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,618
- Expenses
- $12,508
- Assets
- $110
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSHUA SMALLWOOD (President)
- HOLLY SMALLWOOD (Vice President)
- MITCHELL D YOUNG (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JOSHUA SMALLWOOD (President)
- HOLLY SMALLWOOD (Vice President)
- MITCHELL D YOUNG (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Mission of PINES ATHLETIC CLUB is to organize and operate community youth athletics and sporting events, competitions, teams, and leagues, and to foster public participation therein. Believing that (i) participation in athletic pursuits contributes to the well-being of youth participants, their families, and the community, and (ii) youth participants should not be unable to participate in youth sports due to financial constraints, PINES ATHLETIC CLUB intends to conduct the Activities at no or reduced cost for youth participants and their families. PINES ATHLETIC CLUB will arrange and pay for use of sporting facilities necessary for the Activities. PINES ATHLETIC CLUB, through its Directors and volunteers, will arrange for scheduling, hosting, coaching, supervision, and conduct of the events.
What it reported doing in 2024
Provided supervised program of instruction for competitive baseball for children between the ages of 6-18.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 99
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99.1%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 99.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.