Pinellas County Urban League Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 591665523
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7273272081
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,204,913
- Expenses
- $8,556,456
- Assets
- $7,780,948
- Liabilities
- $582,522
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Andrea Gaskin-Capehart (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Andrea Gaskin-Capehart (President & CEO): $213,992 total reported compensation
- Vonda Ford (Highest Compensated Employee): $141,821 total reported compensation
- Anysia McDowall (Highest Compensated Employee): $132,754 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Pinellas County Urban League is to enable and empower African Americans and others who are underserved in our communities to achieve their highest human potential and secure economic self-reliance, parity, power, and civil rights.
What it reported doing in 2025
Energy Assistance and Weatherization - Provides energy payment assistance to low income individuals and families in times of weather related emergencies or crisis situations. This program also provides energy related home improvements which make the home safer, healthier, and more comfortable. Services include installing and insulating water heaters, installing insulation in the attic, caulking, weather stripping and repair or replacement of defective doors and windows. This program served 6,907 people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 45% for direct work, and 55% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 88
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 83.8%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $764.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 83.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $214K · 20 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $219K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.