Pinellas County Sheriff's Police Athletic League Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593760782
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Saint Petersburg, FL, USA
- Phone
- 7275215315
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Delinquency Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,747,697
- Expenses
- $1,495,530
- Assets
- $891,814
- Liabilities
- $64,518
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATHLEEN LITTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- COREY MCLAUGHLIN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- HAROLD M PAXTON JR (DIRECTOR)
- JAMES ROBERTO (SECRETARY)
- KATHLEEN LITTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The pinellas county sherrifs police athletic league pals mission is to provide positive activities, academics, mentoring, leadership, training, tutoring, and life skills programming to pinellas county youth. The vision of the pinellas county sheriffs police athletic league is to provide a positive influence on youth in the pinellas county.
What it reported doing in 2024
Pals education, recreation, community service, and sports programs serve as the foundation for the development of leadership skills, good citzenship, and good sportsmanship. Pals programs target youth primarily in unincorprated lealman33714 and 33709, an area identified as one of pinellas countys five at risk zones with a concentration of poverty and crime. Its pals policy to accept any child regardless of ability to pay and serves all interested children with emphasis on a target population of at-risk youth from low income to poverty level families. Pals endeared by its many community partnerships help expand pals reach to serve more children and their families. Pals name bearing partner, pinellas county sheriffs office, delivers positive interactions with law enforcement for pals vulenarble at risk youth. This and pals many other strategic partnerships highlight and promote the system of care for this unincorporated area to enhance the resouces, the family and the community. None of this would be without generous people in our community who care about the kids.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $32.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.4%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.