Pinelands Jr Wildcats Football
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272620213
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Little Egg Harbor, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6098799866
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,499
- Expenses
- $76,155
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERTA RAPISARDI (PRESIDENT)
- ALISON WAY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERTA RAPISARDI (PRESIDENT)
- ALISON WAY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- TIMOTHY FURRY (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The pinelands jr wildcats football and cheer organization purpose is to provide youth in our area, regardless of race, creed, national origin or sexual orientation, the opportunity to participate in a controlled athletic competition; to familiarize boys and girls with the fundamentals of football, to provide the opportunity to play games in a supervised, organized and safty-oriented manner; to keep the wellfare of the participants of any adult ambition and personal glory; and to emphasize self-discipline, team work, fun and sportsmanship
What it reported doing in 2024
We supported 125 children in the cheer program and 110 children in the football program our cheer program placed second in regional compitition in 2023 our participants range in age from 5 to 14
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 72% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.2%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 37% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.