Pinebelt Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 721390352
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2021
- Location
- Hattiesburg, MS, USA
- Phone
- 6015836180
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,479,228
- Expenses
- $6,143,471
- Assets
- $61,930,686
- Liabilities
- $1,684,433
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SEAN PRIEBE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CARLOS BROWN (TREASURER)
- PHIL HANBERRY (PAST PRESIDE)
- ANNIE MCMILLAN (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The foundation is a not-for-profit organization designed to support charitable activities to benefit the residents of the pine belt area of south Mississippi. The mission is to build better communities through philanthropy. As a driving force in our region, our mission is to build stronger communities through philanthropy. Donors can establish charitable legacies and provide leadership to address community needs in a manner that is responsible, responsive, and lasting.
What it reported doing in 2025
Scholarships. The foundation grants scholarships for students attending institutions of higher education.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 99% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 55
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 92
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.9%; rating input score 24
- Program expense ratio: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: $550.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 97.1%; rating input score 97; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 78.4%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 10.08; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 23.9% of revenue deployed · 93.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $5.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 133 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 116 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 24/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.