Pin Down Bladder Cancer Inc C/o Marvin Traub Llc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454890970
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6467232990
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Diseases of Specific Organs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,982
- Expenses
- $13,209
- Assets
- $46,008
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- MORTIMER SINGER (DIRECTOR)
- AMY HAFKIN (DIRECTOR, TREASURER)
- DR BERNARD BOCHNER (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Increasing public awareness regarding bladder cancer. Inform thepublic about the prevalence and treatment of bladder cancer. Raisingfunds for bladder cancer research conducted by the sloan-ketteringinstitute in New York, ny.
What it reported doing in 2017
Public awareness - increasing public awareness regarding bladder cancer. Inform the public about the prevalence and treatment of bladder cancer.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.4%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -165.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.48; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -53.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.4% of revenue deployed · 0.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $19 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 1 filing year from 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.