Pima County Search & Recovery Divers Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942795587
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Oro Valley, AZ, USA
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,292
Expenses
$835
Assets
$30,423

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Catherine C Wasmann PhD (President)
  • Robert A Offerle (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Catherine C Wasmann PhD (President)
  • Robert A Offerle (Vice President)
  • John J Longhofer PhD (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the Pima County Search & Recovery Divers Inc. is to voluntarily assist in all aquatic search and recovery operations within Southern Arizona to assist any other unit or community that has need for the groups assistance to promote aquatic safety throughout Southern Arizona and to assist with any non-law enforcement search and recovery mission with group discretion.

What it reported doing in 2024

Diving equipment maintenance. Annual SCUBA equipment inspections servicing and replacement parts. Diving-related parts. Dive training expenses. SCUBA tank air fills. Medical equipment replacement and parts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 50.7%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 63.6%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 36.43; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -25.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 50.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $835 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.