Pilot Point Pto Intermediate School
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460750746
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Pilot Point, TX, USA
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,376
- Expenses
- $33,743
- Assets
- $15,067
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- STEPHANIE JOYNER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHANIE JOYNER (PRESIDENT)
- GABRIELLA HESTER (SECRETARY)
- JESSICA DUNN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The pilot point early childhood center & elementary parent teacher organization (pto) is a non-profit organization whose purpose is to enhance the educational environments of pilot point elementary-aged schools by providing opportunities that support teachers, administration, students, and parents alike. The pto raises funds for educational materials and experiences, school supplies, classroom necessities, family fun school events, and extracurricular activities with a goal of enriching the school experience, deepening community spirit, and enhancing our childrens educational and social developmental experiences. An all-volunteer organization, the pilot point early childhood center & elementary pto aims to support teachers, administration, students, and families within the pilot point community as they learn and grow together.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide classroom supplies, fund extracurricular activities, and acknowledge the efforts of the faculty and staff.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.2%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 82.7%; rating input score 83
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.45; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.2% of revenue deployed · 82.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.