Pilipino Oklahoma Women Expediting Relief Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464180391
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Oklahoma City, OK, USA
- Phone
- 4058431986
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Disaster Preparedness and Relief Services
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $500
- Assets
- $47,626
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LANI LIMBO GARNER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LANI LIMBO GARNER (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM JERRY GARNER (TREASURER)
- PERLA MELSBY (VICE-PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The specific objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be to provide assistance in meeting the immediate needs of food, clothing, shelter, employment, coping, legal services and any other necessary services. The intent is to help pilipino families become reasonably self- sufficient and on the road to recovery without sole reliance on traditional public charities. No substantial part of the activities of this corporation shall be the carrying on of propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation , and this corporation shall not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distribution of statements), any political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public office. Notwithstanding any other provisions of these bylaws, this corporation shall not carry on any activities not permitted to be carried on (a) by a corporation exempt from federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.
What it reported doing in 2025
Donation to children education grants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 38
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 95.25; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $500 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 3 of 3 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.