Piklerloczy USA Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731379513
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Pacific Palisades, CA, USA
Phone
9188097548
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,672
Expenses
$91,162
Assets
$29,868

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Guillaume Vallee (Vice President)
  • ELSA CHAHIN (CEO)
  • LAURA WILLHOITE (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JOHANNA HERWITZ (Board Member)
  • ANN RUTH MYERS (Board Member)
  • GABRIELLE ANWAR (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization works in collaboration with the pikler house in budapest, hungary, which is a pedagogical research and training facility for infants-toddlers based on the work of dr. Emmi pikler. In addition to raising funds to support the pikler house, we are writing articles about the pikler pedagogy, giving workshops, and presenting at conferences around the world.

What it reported doing in 2022

We are writing articles about the methodology, giving workshops, and presenting at large conferences all over the world, including canada, hungary, and the U.S.a.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 50% for direct work, and 50% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 37.6%; rating input score 38

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -197.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.8% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 37.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $34K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.