Pikes Peak Family Connections Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
840705937
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Colorado Springs, CO, USA
Phone
7195201019
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Child Abuse, Prevention

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$211,608
Expenses
$207,825
Assets
$61,386
Liabilities
$6,600

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Strengthen parent/child relations and prevent abuse

What it reported doing in 2012

The organization's mission is to prevent child abuse and neglect by educating and supporting parents so children have safe, healthy and stable family relationships. This mission is accomplished through the following: the organization offers the nuturing parenting program, a 16 week evidence based psycho educational curriculum for parents and children (0-18) to attend together; kpc kids' place, a respite nursery providing up to 72 hours of care for children, newborn through age five, who may be at risk fo abuse, neglect or abandonment, various resource and referral activities, and public presentations to raise awareness about the long-term impact of family violence and child maltreatment in our community and state.the organization is an active participant as a founding member of two larege multi-agency collaberations promoting a seamless array of human services to at risk families (family empowerment team of Colorado springs and el paso county integrated core services consortium), hositn an annual child abuse prevention rally, distribution "never hurt a child" bumper sticker, publishing a bi-annual newsletter, and providing community engagement opportunities through volunteering, financial contributions and sponsorships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.1%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $135K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $27K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 17/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.