Pikes Peak Citizens for Life Educational Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260770794
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Colorado Spgs, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7196301999
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Reproductive Health Care Facilities and Allied Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $162,941
- Expenses
- $132,243
- Assets
- $156,104
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- Mike Schell (PresidentCEO)
- Lynda J Keck (Treasurer)
- Mark Spengler (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
MISSION To protect life because every life matters from conception to natural death To promote foster encourage uphold and support reverence and respect for human life with regard to condition age race religion or color whether born or unborn To educate the community about the dangers of abortion euthanasia infanticide and compulsory sterilization and also to any form of repressive of permissive legislation which would allow the debasement of humankind Also to encourage and promote a favorable spiritual physical and cultural environment which would improve the quality of life in a manner consistent with the above purposes
What it reported doing in 2025
Annual Rose Campaign in our churches and synagogues to bring awareness during Respect Life Month Oct Public information booths at the El Paso County Fair and Colorado State Fair and other public venues to educate the public on current life issues and encourage involvement in our programs Sponsorship for Sidewalk Advocates for Life program to disseminate educational material to mothers considering pregnancy options
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 56
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 51.2%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 62.5%; rating input score 63
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.8%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 28.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 51.2% of revenue deployed · 62.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $83K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.