Pike County Sheltered Workshop Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 430899115
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Bowling Green, MO, USA
- Phone
- 5733242205
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Sheltered Employment
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $700,197
- Expenses
- $600,616
- Assets
- $484,690
- Liabilities
- $117,368
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lisa Lovell (Executive Director)
- Ed Murray (President)
- Melvin Motley (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Lisa Lovell (Executive Director)
- Ed Murray (President)
- Melvin Motley (Vice-President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Providing job opportunities and training for State-approved handicapped individuals
What it reported doing in 2025
Pike Shop provides job opportunity and training in recycling, contract work and in a retail thrift store to individuals with disabilities approved by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.8%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 92.5%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.2%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.7% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.8% of revenue deployed · 92.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $556K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.