Pike County Bird Hunters Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
351787313
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Owensville, IN, USA
Phone
8124538683
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Fishing, Hunting

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,935
Expenses
$20,174
Assets
$298,276

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEVE BOYER (President)
  • JOHN KINNEY (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • STEVE BOYER (President)
  • JOHN KINNEY (Vice President)
  • KAYE GOWIN (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Establish a licensed shooting preserve, training and field trial areas for bird dog owners; promote means and opportunities for the education of the public to such natural resources and the enjoyment wholesome utilization thereof; promote the safe, legal, and humane taking of wild birds; promote safe and legal shooting sports; promote and assist in the local implementation of certain Indiana department of natural resources programs dealing with the introduction of natural species of birds to southern Indiana (pheasants and chuckar partridges).

What it reported doing in 2024

Provided a licensed shooting preserve, training and field trial areas for bird dog owners; promoted means and opportunities for the education of the public to such natural resources and the enjoyment wholesome utilization thereof; promoted the safe, legal, and humane taking of wild birds; promoted safe and legal shooting sports; promoted and assisted in the local implementation of certain Indiana department of natural resources programs dealing with the introduction of natural species of birds to southern Indiana (pheasants and chuckar partridges). These services were provided to both club members and the general public.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -69%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.79; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.