Pietro Micca Lodge Building Association of Norwalk Ct Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

7 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Hold property for pietro micca lodge, a 501 c 3 organization

Hold property for a related exempt organization

Revenue model: Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Scored; rating input score 0

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: 89.2%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 52.08; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: -37.2% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes related organizations
Filing history: 6 filing years from 2014 to 2020
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.