Pierce County Coalition for Developmental Disabilities (PC2)

Legal name: Pierce County Coalition for Developmental Disabilities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
912153695
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tacoma, WA, US
Phone
253.564.0707
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Developmentally Disabled Centers

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$277,576
Expenses
$523,919
Assets
$2,223,375
Liabilities
$11,483

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHELE LEHOSKY (EXECUTIVE DI): $65,500 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Find, inform, educate, and empower individuals with developmental disabilities and their families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Pc2 is a parent-driven non-profit agency serving pierce county Washington citizens who experience a developmental disability, their families, providers, and professionals in the field. Pc2 provides system navigation to individuals and their families for the complex processes of the developmental disabilities administration (dda), ssi, legal issues (guardianships, wills & trusts). Pc2 provides on-going, up-to-date information through electronic e-blasts, newsletters, and social media. Pc2 maintains a comprehensive online resource guide of services and supports available in pierce county, as well as state and federal resources. Pc2's housing program is a revolving down payment assistance program provided to individuals who experience documented developmental disabilities and their families who are first-time home buyers and meet income eligibility. Pc2 works directly with families in all steps of the home-buying process to ensure a successful outcome, providing safe adequate housing to this vulnerable population. Pc2 advertises the program through its regular outreach avenues (i.e. E-blasts), newsletter, social media, word of mouth). In fy 2024-2025, pc2 had 3,183 family contacts. Our website saw 10,779 website visits. We provided 12.5 hours of training. We participated in 10 community resource fair events and partnered with pierce county school districts in 4 dda paperwork night events to help families enroll in services for their children who experience a developmental disability. Our housing program provided one down payment assistance layer to assist first-time homebuyers with a family member who experiences a developmental disability in a home purchase.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 92% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -88.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.24; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.5%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.9% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $449K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $66K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 27/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.