Piedmont Health Services and Sickle Cell Agency

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237362747
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Greensboro, NC, USA
Phone
3362741507
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,447,191
Expenses
$2,108,699
Assets
$4,316,378
Liabilities
$78,666

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANGELIA J FRYER ED D (OUTGOING VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TIMOTHY BELLAMY (PRESIDENT)
  • ELAZZOA MCARTHUR (INCOMING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • BRIAN ELLERBY (OUTGOING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • BONITA SHERROD (CFO): $89,276 total reported compensation
  • BRIAN ELLERBY (OUTGOING EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $67,958 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide outreach, education, screening and case management for people with high-risk health problems. Our vision is to become a leading community-based preventive health and outreach agency for all people.the agency's service area includes: region 1 - alamance, caswell, forsyth, guilford, randolph, rockinghamregion 2 - mecklenburgregion 3 - carteret, craven, jones, greene, lenoir, onslow, pamlico, wayne, davie, davidson, surry, stokesregion 4 - cumberlandregion 5 - hoke, moore, richmond, roberson, scotland

What it reported doing in 2024

Sickle cell services: sickle cell disease is a group of inherited red blood cell disorders. It causes symptoms ranging from pain, to organ damage, to anemia. The agency provides the following sickle cell services: a) newborn screening - free testing for sickle cell trait and sickle cell disease; b) genetic counseling - provided to individuals with sickle cell disease, sickle cell trait and other related genetic disorders; c) case management - clients participate in a comprehensive case management program. Our case managers and nurses develop all-encompassing plans in order to provide medical services, referrals, education, transportation and even emergency financial assistance in order to ensure the highest quality of life for our clients; d) summer enrichment camp - the agency sponsors a week-long camp every summer for children ages 6 through 15 with sickle cell disease. The goal of the camp is to foster the social, emotional, and physical growth of children with sickle cell disease by providing a variety of fun and exciting activities in a medically supervised environment.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 73% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.3%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 93%; rating input score 93
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.8%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.05; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.9% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.3% of revenue deployed · 93% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $89K · 16 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.