Piedmont Family Ymca Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541717336
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Charlottesville, VA, USA
- Phone
- 4349749622
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Young Men's or Women's Associations
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,560,756
- Expenses
- $10,327,164
- Assets
- $19,818,921
- Liabilities
- $7,185,719
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSICA TAYLOR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- JESSICA TAYLOR (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $258,908 total reported compensation
- CHRIS CARR (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $146,914 total reported compensation
- ARIC HOLSINGER (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $37,582 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The y strengthens community through youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. We believe that lasting personal and social change can only come about when we all work together to invest in our kids, our health and our neighbors.
What it reported doing in 2025
Youth development - our ymca is committed to nurturing the potential of every child and teen. We believe all kids have great potential and deserve the opportunity to discover who they are and what they can achieve. That's why we help young people cultivate the values, skills and relationships that lead to positive behaviors, better health and educational achievement. Our ymca programs include early childhood education, after school, academic enrichment, school readiness, summer day camp, swimming and youth sports, and offer a range of experiences that enrich social-emotional, cognitive and physical growth. Expenses include subsidies and direct financial assistance that make participation possible for the young people we engage.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.1%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 72.3%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.3%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.1% of revenue deployed · 72.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $7.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $259K · 24 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $289K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.